Description by Canon:

An 18-megapixel interchangeable-lens compact system camera small enough to take anywhere. Enjoy simple creative controls and superb low-light performance for stunning images.


New EOS M firmware is coming soon, with a promise to make the camera slightly more bearable.

Good news for the few among you daring enough to buy into Canon's half-baked mirrorless proposal. News from Canon Rumors: 

"We’re told new firmware for the EOS M will be coming “soon”. Possibly in the next two weeks. The firmware will address various things in the camera, the biggest being improving AF performance. Do not expect miracles about how much it can be improved, but the camera should “hunt a lot less” in lower contrast situations. We’ll also see an improvement in AF tracking."

Canon EOS M review by Joshua Waller at EPZ: "The Canon EOS M is capable of taking pleasing photos with an extremely compact body, although there are some issues worth noting."

Joshua takes kind of a pity of the EOS M, a camera that-in my personal opinion, can take excellent images (of not too fast moving, but preferably totally inanimate objects) but sucks at pretty much everything else. But no need to worry my dear Canonistas, before this year ends we'll be blessed with at least a new, more capable mirrorless body + a couple of matching from Canon. Plenty of high-res jpegs and raw files accompany this review:

"There are cheaper competitors available than the Canon EOS M, with quicker focus, a larger choice of lenses, as well as features including Wi-Fi. In addition, the other systems available either feature a built in pop-up flash or smaller external flashes.

The Canon EOS M has a small well designed body with an easy to use 3 inch touch screen, however the limited number of lenses, as well as the extremely slow focus and short battery life are rather frustrating limitations holding the camera system back. It would be nice to see some of these issues resolved . . . read more

Canon EOS-M camera review by Ken Rockwell: The world's first serious mirrorless camera. (Ed: Thank you, i'll throw my E-M5 and X-E1 away now)

Straddling the border between sober reporting and being the Fox News of photography is a hard thing to do, and this time Ken leans towards the latter:

"The Canon EOS M is the world's first serious mirrorless camera that actually gives good images, and by good images, I mean images with fantastic color as shot. Other brands like Sony, Fuji and LEICA don't give me the colors I demand unless I fiddle with them afterwards, and doing this for a living, I can't afford to fix something afterwards that shouldn't have been broken in the first place. I love the colors I get from Canon right out of the camera as JPGs. . . . read more

Canon EF-M 18-55 IS STM lens review by Ken Rockwell: This EF-M 18-55 IS STM is the best 18-55mm lens I've tested for Canon.

This Canon EF-M 18-55 IS STM is the best 18-55mm lens I've tested for Canon. This makes perfect sense because the EF-M format allows the lens designers the freedom to place the rear elements much closer to the sensor than the EF-S lenses which have to be designed around avoiding the flipping mirror of DSLRs  I'm sort of ashamed on Sony's part, but the Sony DT 18-55mm SAM and Sony NEX E 18-55mm OSS are poor by comparison. The Sony lenses are much softer and more distorted. Canon doesn't screw around when it comes to lenses; Canon is an optical company first and foremost, not a stereo equipment company like Sony. . . . read more

Canon EOS M review by Richard Sibley at Amateur Photographer: Canon really needs to improve the AF via a firmware update, if possible, as this takes the shine off of what is otherwise a very good camera.

Canon EOS M. The camera everybody loves until they check out the AF speed:

"As its first compact system camera, Canon has done a reasonable job with the EOS M. It is a good size for those who are looking for a pocketable DSLR alternative. Similarly, the initial lenses are quite small given the APS-C-sized sensor, and they are of a good quality. More importantly, the image quality of the EOS M matches that of Canon's EOS DSLR cameras. Those who are wary of touchscreens shouldn't worry too much about the unit fitted to the EOS M. It works well and the only time it is regularly needed is for changing the AF point, and then it is quick and easy to use. . . . read more

Canon EOS M extensive review and iso comparison to Olympus E-M5, Sony NEX-5R/NEX-6/NEX-7 and Nikon 1 J1/J2/V1 by Nasim Mansurov at Photography Life: Not very impressed, better wait and see Canon's next move.

"With the fancy “hybrid autofocus” name, I expected the Canon EOS M to focus very quickly before I received the camera. I thought it would be as fast as the Nikon 1 system, which is still among the fastest in terms of autofocus, especially continuous AF. Unfortunately, the EOS M is a huge disappointment in terms of AF speed, so the fancy name is just a marketing gimmick. It certainly did not live up to my expectations and this was the deal breaker for me. Autofocus speed was poor in both daylight and low light conditions, especially with the 22mm pancake lens. The camera often makes the lens . . . read more

Canon EOS M walks the DXO Mark path, fails to impress the French: It doesn't match the best sensors used by the Sony NEX hybrids by quite a margin but it outperforms the much smaller (by surface area) 1-inch type used in the Nikon 1 series.

Not only that, the EOS M barely matches much smaller older micro 4/3 sensors and gets beaten by the latest crop, like the Olympus E-M5 (65 points vs 71).

"Canon was late to introduce a hybrid or mirrorless camera, but it was probably inevitable the firm would chose to revamp its three-year old APS-C sensor design to keep the body size to reasonably compact dimensions while at the same time offering good image quality. It doesn’t match the best sensors used by the Sony NEX hybrids by quite a margin in some . . . read more

Canon EOS M review by Bryan Carnathan at The-Digital-Picture: The Canon EOS M delivers arguably the best image quality per cubic inch (mm) - or per ounce (gram) of any Canon digital camera produced as of review time.

Interesting quality to weight/volume ratio reference. This excellent review offers a lot in the way of EOS M vs all Canon cameras size and bulk comparisions, pictured with, or without lenses. Also, Bryan seems to have a soft spot for Lowe Pro, since he managed to squeeze 11 links to various L-P cases and bags within the review. But the most important question is if he liked the EOS M, and hes he did, very much so, maybe because its no bigger that a pocket Jeebers book:

"The on-sensor phase-detection AF quickly brings the subject into near-accurate focus and contrast detection more slowly . . . read more

Nikon 1 J2 review by Nasim Mansurov at P.Life: The Nikon 1 J2 is still overpriced. At $550 for a single lens kit, it just makes no sense to buy it. Not when the V1 kit is $299 and not when excellent Micro 4/3 and Sony cameras are priced $500 and less.

For those interested, this review contains sections with comparisons to the Olympus EM-5, the Sony NEX-5R, and the Canon EOS M. Of course, being equipped with a much smaller sensor, the Nikon 1 J2 is no match for these cvameras when it comes to high iso performance, but the little guy does have a couple of aces under its sleeves:

"The Nikon 1 system has an interesting story to tell. When Nikon initially launched its first mirrorless system, it positioned two cameras for different segments – the Nikon 1 J1 for beginners and those who wanted to move up from a point and . . . read more

Canon EOS M review by Gavin Stoker at Photography Blog: EOS class image quality, but the other aspects of this camera remind us we have Canon's first try at mirrorless.

"Canon’s debut take on a compact system camera in the EOS M was always going to generate big interest, even if its own manufacturer’s introduction of it has seemed oddly muted and lacking in fanfare to date. Is the reason obvious because Canon simply wants to avoid cannibalising sales of its own DSLRs and the likes of the PowerShot G15 with the EOS M, or will a bigger promotional push come early in the New Year?

Whatever the backroom thought processes, we are left with a reasonably successful if slightly quirky blending of a Canon . . . read more

Nasim Mansurov at PhotographyLife: Battle of the mirrorless (part 1), the Nikon 1 J2, Canon EOS-M, Sony NEX-F3, Sony NEX-5R/NEX-6, Sony NEX-7 and Olympus OM-D EM-5 duke it out above iso 1600.

I really respect Mr. Mansurovs musings and reviews, but this 'battle' comes straight from the land of bloody obvious. There's a mini sensor (the Nikon 1 J2), a bit larger one (Olympus E-M5) and then a whole bunch of Aps-c sized ones. At least throw in a Fujifilm X-E1 in the mix for some real fun. I guess part 2 (Dynamic range) will be more interesting.

"As I have already mentioned before, I will be measuring dynamic range myself going forward without having to rely on other websites for the data. It will be interesting to see how my data compares to other sites like DxOMark. I am not . . . read more

Canon DPP 3.12.52, EOS Utility 2.12.3, RAW Codec 1.11.1 and Picture Style Editor 1.12.2 Released: Support added for all the latest Canon cameras, and new features.

Changes for Digital Photo Professional 3.12.52 Updater:

- Supports images taken with EOS 6D.
- Supports new lens (EF24-70mm F4L IS USM).
- Supports read-in of Picture Style files (.pf3) created in Picture Style Editor 1.12.2 and later.
- Corrects shooting date error in other manufacturer`s image files when sent to Easy-PhotoPrintEX from Digital Photo Professional via plug-in print.

Changes in Canon RAW Codec 1.11.0: . . . read more

AF speed duel at Olympus OM-D E-M5 vs Canon EOS M, ok, this is not funny any longer.

"At the beginning of the planning that somehow I will discuss this movie, but after some thought, I leave it - mercifully - no comment . Just one note: it was a battle of the Olympus E-M5, but just as quickly set the focus two new PEN E-PL5 s and E-PM2. Also, a comparison with Panasonikiem G5, or GH3 would GF5 very similar result.

Well, the first Micro Four Thirds mirrorless cameras also were not as fast as the latest models. What remains is to wish Canon to the rapid development of the system." . . . read more

Canon EOS M review at We have no idea about its position in the marketplace, and Canon appears equally clueless.

"Essentially, the EOS M is just the beginning to what we hope will develop into a fully-fledged system that offers at least one body for serious photographers. In the interim, anyone considering the EOS M as a DSLR replacement will be less than satisfied with the lack of a viewfinder and the camera's relatively sluggish response times, even though they will have no complaints about the quality of either still pictures or video clips.

If you're considering the EOS M as a compact back-up body for an EOS DSLR user, it's certainly a contender – provided . . . read more

Canon EOS M gets hacked, on its way to receive a Magic Lantern treatment and finally become a very exciting camera.

"With a little guesswork, we were lucky to notice that on the inside, the little EOS-M is very similar to the 5D Mark III. So, with a few tricks we were able to dump the firmware and print the familiar "Hello World" message – the proof that Magic Lantern will work on the EOS-M. In his review, Roger Cicala said the EOS-M is "a firmware update and a price drop away from being a great camera". We, the developers of ML, will try to address the first issue. . . . read more

Canon EOS M Hands-On Field Test at So late to the party, the other cameras make fun of it.

"Chris and I were discussing how the EOS M seemed ‘really late to the mirrorless party’ when he realized we could convey that idea in a little more interesting way. So we decided to shoot our first stop motion film.  The script came together very quickly, and we grabbed a bunch of mirrorless cameras to stage our little skit.  The setup was simple, we had extra tile for a floor and some dollhouse props.  We lit the scene with a single Lumahawk 3K daylight balanced LED, which let us keep from moving lights around as much as possible." . . . read more

Canon EOS M review at Sans Mirror: Well built with excellent photo and video qualities, but really, really slow.

"Okay, maybe the Canon marketers can help me out. This is straight from the main copy on their site: "Canon introduced the market to Full HD video capture with smooth, quiet continuous autofocus made possible by Movie Servo AF and STM lenses, advanced CMOS sensor technology, and the processing power of DIGIC 5. The EOS M Digital Camera leverages these key technologies to deliver high-quality moving and still images with creativity provided by Canon's extensive family of interchangeable lenses." Wait, what, it's a video camera that takes stills? Sure enough, in the feature list, the first . . . read more

Canon EOS M review at Camera Labs: Logical path for Canon owners, but slow AF, no EVF and limited choice of native lenses makes it a really hard choice.

"From the point of view of a compact upgrader, the Canon EOS M and Olympus E-PL5 offer two very different propositions. Despite the different sensor size - the 18 Megapixel APS-C sensor in the EOS M is a little larger than the PEN E-PL5's 16 Megapixel Four Thirds sensor - in quality terms there's actually little to choose between them.

In terms of native lenses, the PEN E-PL5 is an easy winner, with access to over 30 options from the mature Micro Four . . . read more

Canon EOS M review at PetaPixel: Nice first try at mirrorless, but the AF is so slow it becomes a deal breaker.

"The Canon EOS M is a camera that falls one big step short of being a fantastic mirrorless camera. If only it had an autofocus system as solid as its other specs and attributes, it’d be a camera that we’d recommend in a heartbeat to both serious photographers and casual consumers.

Unfortunately, its major flaw lies in a feature that’s absolutely critical for most photographers, so unless you know for a 

. . . read more

Canon EOS M review at the Tech Radar: Good only with dead, or otherwise inanimate subjects.

"Canon's Hybrid AF system isn't as fast as Panasonic or Olympus's contrast detection systems - or Sony's Hybrid AF system - and the M isn't suited to shooting anything other than stationary subjects. We'd also like a less reflective screen to provide a better view in bright sunlight. As yet Canon only has one CSC and two compatible lenses (plus and adapter), . . . read more

Canon EOS M review at Engadget

wellity wellity wellity, the elusive and much delayed EOS M is finally put to the test:

"We like the Canon EOS M -- far more than we might have expected, given its mediocre performance during our hands-on -- but the company's first mirrorless ILC falls short on several fronts. Professional photographers can affix their pricey L lenses, . . . read more

Selected Items
Click to close the selection preview
Compare List
Teleconverters: Click to see the selected items
Click to Compare the selected items
Flashes: Click to see the selected items
Click to Compare the selected items
Lenses: Click to see the selected items
Click to Compare the selected items
Cameras: Click to see the selected items
Click to Compare the selected items